Objections to the termination of this anti-subsidy proceeding were raised in the Advisory committee.

The companies investigated for the purpose of the investigation of subsidisation are listed in recital 22 below.

The companies investigated for the purpose of the investigation of subsidisation are listed in recital below.

terminating the anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating in Malaysia and Thailand

On the same day, the Commission initiated an anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports into the Union of certain PET originating in the countries concerned [3].

The Commission therefore concludes that the anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports into the Union of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia should be terminated.

On the same day, the Commission initiated an anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports into the Union of certain stainless steel bars originating in India [3].

terminating the anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia and repealing Regulation (EU) No 330/2013 making such imports subject to registration

It published a Notice of Initiation on the anti-subsidy proceedings in the Official Journal of the European Union (3).

terminating the anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof originating in India and Malaysia

Any possible findings of the anti-subsidy proceedings are quite distinct from the MET determination.

The Commission therefore concludes that the anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports into the Union of certain polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating in Oman and Saudi Arabia should be terminated

The anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports of dihydromyrcenol of a purity by weight of 93 % or more, falling under CN code ex29052290 and originating in India is hereby terminated.

The complaint contained prima facie evidence of the existence of subsidisation and of material injury resulting therefrom which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of an anti-subsidy proceeding.

The measures imposed had been based on the findings of an antisubsidy proceeding initiated pursuant to Article 10 of the basic Regulation (the original investigation).