The evidence is overwhelming, but what does it matter?

But perhaps you have some countervailing evidence?

If I am such a liar, then by all means, say so in sworn testimony.

And if I then tell them they are lying, they deny it.

They still do in spite of mountains of contrary evidence.

At times, confusion was spread about crystal-clear contrary evidence.

DuPont did not put forth any contrary evidence on this issue.

And the evidence against evolution seems to be growing almost daily.

At times, confusion was spread about crystal-clear contrary evidence .

You really won't let this go despite all the evidence.

Therefore, they will not believe, despite all indications.

Why are stereotypes maintained in the face of contrary evidence?

Why should status quo bias exist in the face of contradictory evidence?

Particularly when there is so much contradictory evidence.

In the case of such presumptions, evidence to the contrary is admitted unless expressly prohibited by law.