Figure 4.1.19 CCD contributions by regulatory measure (percentage)
Figure 4.1.18 CCD contributions by regulatory measure (percentage)
Figure 4.1.18 CCD contributions by regulatory measure ($ millions)
Figure 4.1.17 CCD contributions by regulatory measure ($ millions)
Figure 4.1.17 CCD contributions by regulatory measure ($ millions)
Regulatory action – Canadian Nuclear Laboratories
Regulatory action – Canadian Nuclear Laboratories
Regulatory action – Newfoundland Recycling Limited
Regulatory action – Seymour Pacific Developments Ltd.
Regulatory action issued to Canadian Nuclear Laboratories
corrective/deterrent effect of the regulatory action
Regulatory action issued to Canadian Nuclear Laboratories
Regulatory action issued to Ontario Power Generation
corrective/deterrent effect of the regulatory action
The first is to identify all possible impacts for each of the regulatory and non-regulatory options.
There are three reasons why regulatory action is warranted.
But the federal government has not taken any regulatory action.
However, the government has not taken regulatory action.
December 13, 2018: Regulatory action issued to Ontario Power Generation
Therefore, the net benefits of the regulatory action chosen must be greater than the net benefit of any other type of regulatory or non-regulatory action.
Requêtes fréquentes français :1-200, -1k, -2k, -3k, -4k, -5k, -7k, -10k, -20k, -40k, -100k, -200k, -500k, -1000k,
Requêtes fréquentes anglais :1-200, -1k, -2k, -3k, -4k, -5k, -7k, -10k, -20k, -40k, -100k, -200k, -500k, -1000k,
Traduction Translation Traducción Übersetzung Tradução Traduzione Traducere Vertaling Tłumaczenie Mετάφραση Oversættelse Översättning Käännös Aistriúchán Traduzzjoni Prevajanje Vertimas Tõlge Preklad Fordítás Tulkojumi Превод Překlad Prijevod 翻訳 번역 翻译 Перевод