The class frontier between KPD and SPD was glossed over.

This is certainly a confusion, but in no way can it be a class line.

The two groups were part of the same ruling class and never divided by any class frontiers.

We can defend Bilan and say that the issue of the state is a class line, just as the ICC can defend them, despite the issue of the unions being a ‘class line’.

This is a class frontier sepa class frontier separating the internationalist communist left from “leftism” [i].

Fraction of the International Communist Left, The Defence of the Proletarian Character of the October Revolution is still a Class Frontier, WEB

From the revolutionary point of view, the class frontier is between Marxism and Anarchism.

By default, RIPv2 summarizes updates at classful boundaries just like RIPv1.

In the second place, your own ‘method’ cries out against Stalin’s theory as a dividing line.

This is certainly a confusion, but in no way can it be a class line.

Now, this according to them is a ‘class line’, or, to call a spade a spade, counter-revolutionary.

As Bukharin pointed out, in the war this had become a class line:

All those who today repeat or preach the repetition of Bolshevik errors are on the other side of the class line.

But Bilan also defended the proletarian character of the trade unions, which for the ICC is a ‘class line’.

If this view of the state is a class line, asks the ICC, why is Bilan not counter­revolutionary?