punitive damages, if a neighbor acted maliciously.

The Court did not award any aggravated or punitive damages.

The Appellate Court Reduced the Punitive Damages Award

Coverage of punitive damages (where allowed by law).

Punitive Damages Coverage (where permitted by law)

However, punitive damages are likely to be reduced because of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that limits the ratio of punitive to compensatory damages to 9:1.

The damages award is likely to be reduced due to US Supreme Court rulings that limit the ratio of punitive to compensatory damages to 9:1.

Punitive damages are intended to punish the defendant for particularly egregious behavior.

However, there is likely to be a reduction in punitive damages because of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that limits the ratio of punitive to compensatory damages to 9:1.

It does not allow for punitive or aggravated damages.

The punitive damages are likely to be reduced due to Supreme Court rulings that limit the ratio of punitive and compensatory damages to 9:1.

States that punitive damages may not be awarded in the absence of a compensatory award.

Damages can also include pain and suffering and, under certain circumstances, punitive damages.

Dixon would receive $500,000 in compensatory damages and $300,000 in punitive damages.

There can be no question of aggravated or punitive damages.