This is the opposite of the nuclear deterrent doctrine.

Before giving up the doctrine of nuclear deterrence?

Nuclear deterrence is based on the threat of retaliation.

Approval of a limitation period for the doctrine of mutual deterrence

It is necessary to understand: is the concept of nuclear deterrence still relevant?

The chief obstacle to starting this work is continued adherence to the doctrine of nuclear deterrence.

They confirmed the NATO politics of determent and the option of the first strike for the use nuclear weapons.

Their vision shocked experts in the doctrine of nuclear deterrence, but galvanized the hopes of people around the world.

Rather, buoyed by the doctrine of deterrence, they argue that reductions would weaken global security.

It is necessary to admit that installation of an anti-missile shield supposes the failure of dissuasion and this is not without its problems in regard to even the doctrine of dissuasion defined by countries armed with nuclear weapons.

However, Carter suggested that the deterrence doctrine might have to be "adjusted" in the future to adapt to new threats.

However, Carter suggested that the deterrence doctrine might have to be “adjusted” in the future to adapt to new threats.

(It should be noted that the doctrine of deterrence is severely criticized by those who worry about the implications of threatening mass slaughter.(6))

(It should be noted that the doctrine of deterrence is severely criticized by those who worry about the implications of threatening mass slaughter {6}.)

It is necessary to admit that installation of an anti-missile shield supposes the failure of dissuasion and this is not without its problems in regard to even the doctrine of dissuasion defined by countries armed with nuclear weapons.