I find that rather antithetical to good scientific thinking.

The scientific method is a problem-solving process.

We have a scientific base and a spiritual attitude.

This process is called ‘the scientific method’ or scientific inquiry.

The approach is known as the scientific method or scientific inquiry.

Scientific theories must be testable empirically.

Three key features characterize the scientific method:

Development of a more rigorous scientific approach

That is the basic difference of a scientific approach, and a religious approach.

This is the difference between the scientific approach and the religious approach.

What does a genuine scientific controversy look like?

What does a real scientific controversy look like?

I approach everything I do with a scientific mind.

What Does A Real Scientific Controversy Look Like?

That seems to be consistent with the scientific method, would it not?