(Judgment 179, under 1; see also Judgments 2225, under 19, 2671, under 10, 2892, under 11, and 3732, under 3.)

The comments in recital 15 have already been addressed in recital 20.

on page 30 in recital 14

All sampled Union producers were benefiting from the exemption scheme described in recital 1 above.

Furthermore, the investigation showed that the industry is benefiting from the exemption scheme which was described in recital 1 above.

(See also Judgments 3995, under 7, 3882, under 13, and 3682, under 8.)

(See Judgment 2366, under 16, confirmed in Judgments 3433, under 9, and 3512, under 3.)

Amount as referred to in recital 117 of the Decision.

Amount as referred to in recital 110 of the Decision.

Amount as referred to in recital 111 of the Decision.

(See Judgments 2226, under 20, and 1234, under 19.)

[T]he Tribunal is not empowered to order apologies (see Judgments 3966, under 5, 3791, under 7, 3597, under 10, and 2417, under 28).

As stated in recital 18, seven companies submitted questionnaire replies.

The legal effect of this provision has been acted upon by the Tribunal on earlier occasions (see Judgments 211, consideration 1, 871, consideration 1, and 1141, considerations 20 and 21).

Where the ninetieth day falls on a public holiday, the period is extended until the next business day (see Judgments 2250, under 8, 3393, under 1, and 3467, under 2).