Conclusions on the evidence put forward by the Commission

105 In those circumstances, it is necessary to examine the evidential value of the elements put forward by the Commission.

the decision clearly details what evidence is being relied upon and includes an explanation of why that evidence is credible and persuasive;

105 In those circumstances, it is necessary to examine the evidential value of the elements put forward by the Commission.

105 In those circumstances, it is necessary to examine the evidential value of the elements put forward by the Commission.

The Court of First Instance concluded that all of those documents were irrelevant by comparison with the evidence on which the Commission had relied.

Hajras al-Qurey’s lawyer complained that the only evidence used by the prosecution to sentence his client was the coerced ‘confessions’, but the court dismissed his complaint.