Reiteration of the precedent or jurisprudential change?

One might even say it’s a true example of resurrection.

One might even say it’s a true example of resurrection.

But a jurisprudence allowing the prohibition of abortion is equally unworkable.

Target-based variable remuneration: a reversal of case law favorable to companies

Departure from precedent: the impossibility for the courts to determine the existence of State title

Departure from existing case-law: The limitation of liability clause survives the rescission of a contract

Home News Labor & Employment Target-based variable remuneration: a reversal of case law favorable to companies

Right to a fair trail: The French Supreme Court indicates how to apply the reversal of the case law which intervened in (...)

Target-based variable remuneration: a reversal of case law favorable to companies

The Court takes note of that departure from precedent and welcomes the Court of Cassation’s efforts to bring its decisions into line with European case-law.

The Court notes that the applicant has made only one application to the Administrative Court since the change in the case-law.

However, I believe that the fundamental change of direction really occurred in the judgment in A and B v. Norway.

If the laws, regulations or departure from precedent on which rests Indemniflight causes a lapse of customer indemnification rights.

France could therefore uphold the applicant’s claim without amending the legislation; a change in the Court of Cassation’s case-law would suffice.