Cross-claim and responses to the cross-claim
Relationship between the main action and the cross-claim
15 pages for the cross-claim and for responses thereto
Form of order sought, pleas in law and arguments contained in the cross-claim
A cross-claim shall be deemed to be devoid of purpose
The parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal other than the applicant may submit a cross-claim within the same time limit as that prescribed for the submission of a response.
That cross-claim must be introduced by a separate document and meet the requirements set out in Articles 183 and 184 of the Rules of Procedure.
Decisions of administrative courts are subject to appeal as to the merits, interlocutory appeal and complaint (Article 853).
An appeal may be lodged against the return of the application, a copy of which is not served.
Decisions of administrative courts are subject to appeal as to the merits, interlocutory appeal and complaint (Article 853).
This interlocutory appeal and the subsequent action to have the Constitutional Court’s decision set aside (see paragraph 26 in fine above), although both justified, nevertheless complicated the proceedings to some extent (see paragraph 50 above).
This interlocutory appeal and the subsequent action to have the Constitutional Court’s decision set aside (see paragraph 26 in fine above), although both justified, nevertheless complicated the proceedings to some extent (see paragraph 50 above).
An appeal may be lodged against the return of the application, a copy of which is not served.
The patent proprietor, who has not filed an appeal and is therefore only a party to the proceedings under Article 107, second sentence, EPC, does not have the right to file a 'cross-appeal' without limit of time.
The patent proprietor, who has not filed an appeal and is therefore only a party to the proceedings under Article 107, second sentence, EPC, does not have the right to file a "cross- appeal" without limit of time.
The patent proprietor, who has not filed an appeal and is therefore only a party to the proceedings under Article 107, second sentence, EPC, does not have the right to file a "cross-appeal" without limit of time.
The patent proprietor, who has not filed an appeal and is therefore only a party to the proceedings under Article 107, second sentence, EPC, does not have the right to file a 'cross-appeal' without limit of time.
The patent proprietor, who has not filed an appeal and is therefore only a party to the proceedings under Article 107, second sentence, EPC, does not have the right to file a "cross- appeal" without limit of time.
The patent proprietor, who has not filed an appeal and is therefore only a party to the proceedings under Article 107, second sentence, EPC, does not have the right to file a "cross- appeal" without limit of time.
On appeal by the Attorney General and a cross-appeal by S.T., the Court of Appeal (composed of Sir John Donaldson, Master of the Rolls, Lord Justice Dillon and Lord Justice Bingham) affirmed, on 10 February 1988, the decision of Mr Justice Scott.
16 The patent proprietor, who has not filed an appeal and is therefore only a party to the proceedings under Article 107, second sentence, EPC, does not have the right to file a "cross- appeal" without limit of time.
On 8 May 1984, this decision was communicated to Mr. Baraona, who on 10 May 1984 lodged notice of an interlocutory appeal against it to the Supreme Administrative Court.
Requêtes fréquentes français :1-200, -1k, -2k, -3k, -4k, -5k, -7k, -10k, -20k, -40k, -100k, -200k, -500k, -1000k,
Requêtes fréquentes anglais :1-200, -1k, -2k, -3k, -4k, -5k, -7k, -10k, -20k, -40k, -100k, -200k, -500k, -1000k,
Traduction Translation Traducción Übersetzung Tradução Traduzione Traducere Vertaling Tłumaczenie Mετάφραση Oversættelse Översättning Käännös Aistriúchán Traduzzjoni Prevajanje Vertimas Tõlge Preklad Fordítás Tulkojumi Превод Překlad Prijevod 翻訳 번역 翻译 Перевод