Thus, in its view, the acts giving rise to the alleged damage were performed in Lithuania.

the defendant argues that the alleged damage cannot be assessed

The seriousness of the complaint, including the seriousness of the harm alleged

Carry out a critical assessment of the harm claimed by the other party

The damage claimed by the respondents was sustained largely in Ontario.

For the court, such alleged harm was theoretical and hypothetical at that stage.

It is not necessary for imminent harm to be demonstrated with absolute certainty.

It is not necessary for the imminence of the harm to be demonstrated with absolute certainty.

It is not necessary for the imminence of the damage to be demonstrated with absolute certainty.

Defendants have denied the claims and maintain they are not liable for the injury alleged.

Awareness of the importers of the dumping, the extent thereof and the alleged injury

Awareness of the importers of the dumping, the extent thereof and the alleged injury

Awareness of the importers of the dumping, the extent thereof and the alleged injury

To prove harm, one must be able to trace, track, illustrate and show how disclosure of specific information could lead to the harm alleged.

Holds unanimously that the present judgment constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction as regards the alleged non-pecuniary damage;