This item is expected to be insignificant.

Also pay particular attention to the words “significant” and “not significant”.

Also pay attention to: The words "significant" and "non-significant.

Note * = significant at P < 0.05; ns = not significant.

What makes a number “significant” or not significant?

n.s= coefficient not significant at 10%; NA = not applicable.

The difference between “significant” and “non-significant” is not itself statistically significant

what constitutes an immaterial portfolio for the purpose of paragraph 3

Thus, what is the sense of a non-significant result?

So how should the non-significant result be interpreted?

So how should the non-significant result be interpreted?

– Point 1.3.6: introduction of the notion of “significant composition change”. vs “non-significant change

Not statistically significant, as the statistics people would say.

In the data tables, the abbreviation "N.D." means not determined.

When a luminance coefficient has a non-significant descendant (offspring) at a given bitplane level, the chrominance coefficients at the same location also have a high probability to have a non-significant offspring.