want to leave it in good condition when they leave.

Depending on the existing legal circumstances, it might be extended. ↑

Absolutely, for all the reasons mentioned by Stephan and others.

At this point, anything is better than leaving it like it is.

Additionally, portions of the shaft can be maintained and/or rendered less flexible, or stiffer, by allowing the outer portion to remain thereon.

Is it necessary that in this country which is so rich that we have to live like this?

The exception is the numbers 11 and 22, they must be left unchanged.

It would probably be easy to reactivate it by changing some electronic parts but its historical value rather invites to leave it in its original condition.

want to leave it in good condition when they leave.

We could also not change at all, leaving everything as it is.

Depending on the existing legal circumstances, it might be extended. ↑

Absolutely, for all the reasons mentioned by Stephan and others.

Otherwise, you can as here leave your wood in the state and assume the recovery side in the rough.

The competent authority of the executing State shall without delay inform the competent authority of the issuing State by any means capable of producing a written record

Since they want to liquidate us, we are not going to leave the factory as it is.