It was found that all sales were made at a profit.

It was found that the majority of sales were made at a profit.

However, it was found that the incentives received were negligible.

However, it was found that the incentives received were insignificant.

This was found to be the case for both exporting producers.

It has been noted that large and significant investments were made during the period considered.

These imports were found to have taken place over a sustained period of time.

For all companies, overall sales were found to be representative.

Those three persons were found to be members of the CCP.

Furthermore, there is evidence that the allocation of the subsidies is not automatic.

Moreover, it was also found that its AoA contained an export obligation.

This was the case for the exporting producer concerned.

It has been found that there is a likelihood of continuation of injurious dumping.

It was found that within these two main categories, there are different business models.

These claims were cross-checked and it was found that no errors had been made.