In an unfinished piece dated around 1939, Arendt argues that Zionism and assimilationism emerge from a common dogmatism.

In condemning "assimilation" Mr. Liebman had in mind, not violence, not inequality, and not privileges.

This is the strange form of "assimilationism" that has resulted from the attempt to create a "Post-Jewish" Israel.

For some months, we have denounced multiculturalism as a failure in favour of what you call "neo-assimilation".

The question arises: what does our Bundist mean when he cries out to heaven against "assimilation"?

The next stage in the P.R.C. transition from imperial pluralism to Han assimilationism has been the demonization of religion.

What, then, is the Bundist talking about when he shouts to heaven against “assimilation”?

The next stage in the PRC transition from imperial pluralism to Han assimilationism has been the demonization of religion.

For some months, we have denounced multiculturalism as a failure in favour of what you call "neo-assimilation".

The next stage in the P.R.C. transition from imperial pluralism to Han assimilationism has been the demonization of religion.

The next stage in the PRC transition from imperial pluralism to Han assimilationism has been the demonization of religion.

All social-democratic permeationism is based on a theory of mechanical inevitability: the inevitable self-collectivization of capitalism from above, which is equated with socialism.

The people who are shouting most against the “assimilationism” of the Russian orthodox Marxists4 are the Jewish nationalists in Russia, and in particular the Bundists.

The people who are shouting most against the “assimilationism” of the Russian orthodox Marxists4 are the Jewish nationalists in Russia, and in particular the Bundists.

But it is also beyond doubt that the pseudo-Marxist who heaps abuse upon a Marxist of another nation for being an ‘assimilator’ is simply a nationalist philistine.