– Whether there is evidence capable of confirming the existence of an anti-competitive agreement

Consequently, the Commission came to the conclusion that FNAS was not part of the agreement or any other anti-competitive arrangements.

The parties' contacts after 1999 confirmed that there was a single and continuous anticompetitive market-sharing agreement in breach of antitrust law.

High prices or higher prices than elsewhere in Canada are not in and of themselves evidence of an anti‑competitive agreement.

The parties' contacts after 1999 confirmed that there was a single and continuous anticompetitive market-sharing agreement in breach of antitrust law.

257 The applicants claim that the Commission has failed to produce any evidence demonstrating that Chiquita and Pacific entered into an anti-competitive agreement during the lunch meeting.

Every buyer putting any bid represents and warrants that such bids should not the product of any collusive or different anti-competitive agreement and are otherwise in keeping with federal and state laws.

Each buyer placing any bid represents and warrants that such bids usually are not the product of any collusive or other anti-competitive agreement and are otherwise in keeping with federal and state laws.

Each buyer placing any bid represents and warrants that such bids are not the product of any collusive or other anti-competitive agreement and are otherwise consistent with federal and state laws.

Consequently, the Commission cannot use those phone records to support its conclusion that Mr P1 and Mr C1 implemented an anti-competitive agreement between 28 July 2004 and 8 April 2005.